Vol. 5 No. 1 (2025): Studia Humanitatis Journal
Articles: monographic section

Medical diagnosis: from peircean abduction to deweyan practical judgment

Atocha Aliseda
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2706-9844 (unauthenticated) Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México y Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia (Madrid)

Bio

Published 2025-01-31

Keywords

  • Clinical reasoning,
  • Medical diagnosis,
  • Abduction,
  • Practical judgment

Abstract

This article is divided into two parts, the first of which consists of an exposition of clinical reasoning, in particular of medical diagnosis, highlighting its hypothetical aspect. The second part is dedicated to presenting, on the one hand, Charles Peirce’s notion of abduction, in the light of his epistemology. On the other hand, John Dewey’s notion of practical judgment is described in the context of his model of logical inquiry. Finally, the article offers a reflection on the relevance of Peirce’s notions of abduction and of Dewey’s notion of practical judgment towards a characterization of medical diagnosis.

References

  1. Aliseda, A. (2006). Abductive Reasoning: Logical Investigations into Discovery and Explanation. Springer.
  2. Aliseda, A. & Leonides L. (2013). Hypothesis Testing in Adaptive Logics: An Application to Medical Diagnosis. Logic Journal of the IGPL (Interest Group in Pure and Applied Logics), 21(6), 915-930. Oxford Journals. Oxford University Press.
  3. Dewey, J. (1915). The Logic Of Judgments Of Practise. The Journal Of Philosophy, Psychology And Scientific Methods. 12(19), 505–523.
  4. Dewey, J. (1938). Experiencia y Educación. Biblioteca Nueva, traducción de Lorenzo Luzuriaga Medina.
  5. Facione, N. & Facione, P. (2008). Critical Thinking And Clinical Reasoning In The Health Sciences: An International Multidisciplinary Teaching Anthology. The California Academic Press.
  6. Fagot-Largeault, A. (2010). Médecine Et Philosophie. Presses Universitaires De France.
  7. Kassirer, J., Wong, J., & Kopelman, R. (2010). Learning Clinical Reasoning (2nd ed.). Lippincott Williams y Wilkins Health.
  8. Lifshitz, A. (2004). La Enseñanza De La Competencia Clínica. Gaceta Médica De México, Academia Nacional De Medicina De México. 140(3), 312–313.
  9. Lifshitz, A. (2014). La Nueva Clínica. Academia Nacional de Medicina, Colección De Aniversario, 150 Años. Consejo Nacional De Ciencia y Tecnología e Intersistemas Editores.
  10. López, F. E., & Marraud, H. (2023). John Dewey: El método lógico y la ley. Revista Iberoamericana De Argumentación, (27), 134–151. https://doi.org/10.15366/ria2023.27.006
  11. Marcum, J. A. (2008). An Introductory Philosophy Of Medicine. Humanizing Modern Medicine. Philosophy And Medicine, 99, Springer.
  12. Montgomery, K. (2006). How Doctors Think: Clinical Judgment And The Practice Of Medicine. Oxford University Press.
  13. Murphy, E. A. (1976). The Logic Of Medicine, The John Hopkins University Press.
  14. Peirce, C. S. (1931-1958)6. Collected Papers (CP), vols 1-8, Hartshorne, C., Weiss, P. & Burks, A. W. (eds.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  15. Rodríguez de Romo, A. C., Aliseda, A., & Arauz, A. (2008). Medicina y Lógica: El proceso diagnóstico en neurología. Ludus Vitalis, Revista De Filosofía De Las Ciencias De La Vida, XVI(30), 135-163.
  16. Sackett, D. L., Rosenberg, W. M. C., Gray, J. A. M., Haynes, R. B. & Richardson, W. S. (1996). Evidence Based Medicine: What it is and What it sn´t. Its About Integrating Individual Clinical Expertise And The Best External Evidence. British Medical Journal, 312, 71–72.
  17. Simon, H. A. (2006). Las Ciencias De Lo Artificial. Carachapalo, J. (trad.), Comares.
  18. Solomon, M. (2015). Making Medical Knowledge. Oxford University Press.
  19. Thagard, P. (1999). How Scientists Explain Disease. Princeton University Press.
  20. Upshur, R., & Chin-Yee, B. (2017). Clinical Judgment. En M. Solomon, J. R. Simon, & H. Kincaid (Eds.), The Routledge Companion To Philosophy Of Medicine, Routledge (pp.363-371).